Revision as of 16:54, 5 October 2010

NOTE: this page is only partially uploaded. Additional content will be added here October 5-7.

The Big Picture

In Inkscape, it's easy to color in any path region (say, a circle) with the paint-bucket tool (or solid fill in the Fill and Stroke pane). However, it isn't actually that easy for the Eggbot to draw a filled region. The reason is simple: Egg-Bot is a vector printer that draws paths, not a raster printer that draws dots. If you ask it to draw a circle, the pen tip actually moves in a circular path on the surface of the object that you're drawing on. This is like an old pen plotter; it's very different from an inkjet or laser printer, where the entire surface is scanned back and forth.

So, what happens if you ask your Eggbot to draw a filled regions? The Eggbot will simply draw the paths that make up the object, like it always does. The "fill" attributes will be ignored. The net result might be something like this:

Starting with the filled shapes on the left, the Eggbot will actually just plot their outlines, shown on the right.

So, what can you do it you actually want to fill a region with the pen? Clearly, you need to construct some path that the pen can follow through the entire filled region. There are many possible approaches to this problem-- brute force rastering, adaptive filling algorithms, cross-hatching, and on and on. In what follows, we'll show a few different ways to create such pen paths, what you might call "toolpaths" in machining terms. There are a number of different approaches that work best in different circumstances.

One final word before we get started: Plots where you fill solid regions can potentially take a long time with all that back-and-forth business. Where possible, design around having to fill regions.

Hatch Method

This method is described in detail in our smiley face tutorial.

In short:

• Select a single path
• Open the live path effect editor: Path>Path Effect Editor
• Apply new effect: Hatches (rough) and click "+Add"
• Use the extension to set defaults: Extensions>Eggbot>Preset hatch for fills
• Use the "edit paths by node" tool to set the angle, spacing, and bending of the lines.

You may also need to use the Fill & Stroke panel to set the stroke to be a visible pen and the fill to "none."

This "Hatch" method can handle paths that consist of multiple disjoint regions, for example, a set of stars or non-intersecting circles, but it does not work with "hollow" regions, for example a ring or washer (2D torus) shape.

Here are some concrete examples. The four original (filled) shapes are on the left: A star, a square, a square with a star punched out-- essentially a hollow, ring-shaped fill region -- and a smaller square with a star punched out (a set of multiple disjoint regions). In the middle set of four shapes, we've applied the hatch procedure as outlined above. As you can see, it works well on three of the four shapes; but again it does not work on "hollow" areas. (It treats the inner cutout path as a separate path to be filled with hatching.) The set of four shapes on the right have the same hatch applied, but we've also pasted a copy of the original outline shapes on top, to give more definition than you get from the fill alone.

While the hatch method is slightly complicated and does not work in every situation, it is usually the best method in any situation where it can be used. It produces excellent results that plot smoothly and efficiently, with preset deceleration at each switchback and an absolute bare minimum of pen lifts.

Inset Method

So what can you do when you need to draw "hollow" filled shapes that the hatch method fails for? For example, what if you're drawing a US flag on an egg, and with the blue pen, you want to draw the filled blue area around those blue stars. For cases like these, we use the "inset" method, which has its own advantages and disadvantages.

• Select one or more path objects.
• If the object is filled, set the fill to "None," leaving you with just the outline visible.
• (Optional) Open the Inkscape Preferences dialog, scroll to the "steps" pane, and set the "Inset/Outset by:" interval. (A value of 3 px is usually a good starting point.) Close the dialog.
• Repeat the following sequence:

• Duplicate the objects with Ctrl-D (or, Edit>Duplicate)
• Inset the paths with Ctrl-( (or, Path>Inset)

• As you perform that sequence, it will create inset paths that are smaller and smaller until they go away altogether.

Here's how it looks in practice:

Advantages: Can be applied to more than one object at once. Handles complex geometry.

Disadvantages: Tedious to apply. Generates concentric paths that are not connected-- the pen must lift and lower between drawing any two inset shapes. Concentric paths cannot be adjusted in shape or space after being generated. Occasionally, if the inset shape becomes too complicated, the inset operation can fail. (The un-insettable path can usually be fixed by using the "simplify path" command.)

Interpolation and stitch methods

Interpolation

Generate from path> Interpolate

http://inkscape.org/doc/interpolate/tutorial-interpolate.en.html

Stitch Paths

Combine paths Live path effects> Stitch sub-paths

Combining Interpolation and Stitch Paths